Fig. 8 Methacholine-like cholinergic agonists stimulated gene expression in the downstream pathway of the Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR). Expression levels (via quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction [qRT-PCR]) of A, Jun; B, Egr1; or C, Fos in murine pituitary cells after compound treatment for 2 hours. D, Morphology of LβT2 3-dimensional spheroids at 4 days before treatment. There was no change in morphology after treatment (data not shown). Expression levels (via qRT-PCR) of E, Jun, or F, Fos in murine pituitary LβT2 spheroids after compound treatment for 2 hours. G, Molecular docking studies predict the potential binding between carbachol and GnRHR. Docking energy: −4.2 kcal/mol. H, Molecular docking studies predict the potential binding sites between methacholine and the GnRHR. Docking energy: −4.7 kcal/mol. I, Molecular docking studies predict the potential binding between acetylcholine and GnRHR. Docking energy: −4.3 kcal/mol. J, Molecular docking studies predict the potential binding between bethanechol and GnRHR. Docking energy: −4.6 kcal/mol. K, Molecular docking studies predict the potential binding between (2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl)trimethylammonium (2-AET) and GnRHR. Docking energy: −4.6 kcal/mol. All values represent the mean ± SD (n = 3 replicates). Statistical analysis was performed using a one-way analysis of variance with Tukey multiple-comparison test, and the P value is shown in each graph.
Image
Figure Caption
Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and
ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users.
Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image.
Full text @ Endocrinology