FIGURE SUMMARY
Title

The Dissemination of Rift Valley Fever Virus to the Eye and Sensory Neurons of Zebrafish Larvae Is Stat1-Dependent

Authors
Ter Horst, S., Siekierska, A., De Meulemeester, A.S., Cuvry, A., Cools, L., Neyts, J., de Witte, P., Rocha-Pereira, J.
Source
Full text @ Viruses

RVFV infection in zebrafish larvae resulting in viral replication and innate immune response. (A) Schematic representation of the experimental timeline, conditions, and injection site. Drawings acquired through BioRender. (B) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 per zebrafish larva. Mean ± standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) of 5–8 pools of 10 larvae from 8 independent experiments. The dotted line shows limit of quantification (LOQ). (C) Titres of RVFV35/74 infectious viral particles in zebrafish larvae. Mean ± s.e.m. of 6 pools of 10 larvae from 6 independent experiments. (D) Relative fold induction of infϕ1, mxa, isg-15, and rsad2 in RVFV35/74 infected zebrafish larvae compared to PBS-injected zebrafish larvae. Results determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to 18 s, ef1α, and β-actin at 0 dpi. Mean ± s.e.m. of 8 pools of 10 larvae from 8 independent experiments. (E) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 per zebrafish larva after immersion in Danieau’s solution containing the vehicle, 1000 µM, or 10 mM 2′-FdC at 0 dpi. Mean ± s.e.m. of 5 pools of 10 larvae from 5 independent experiments. The dotted line shows LOQ. dpf = days post fertilization; dpi = days post infection; RVFV = Rift Valley fever virus; 2′-FdC = 2′-Fluoro-2′-deoxycytidine; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant.

Viral replication and dissemination of RVFVeGFP in zebrafish larvae, with infection of the liver, sensory nervous system and vascular system. (A) Viral RNA copies of RVFVeGFP per zebrafish larva. Mean ± s.e.m. of 6–8 pools of 10 larvae from 8 independent experiments. (BD,F) Whole mount immunohistochemistry fluorescence images of RVFVeGFP-infected zebrafish larvae at 10× magnification, using anti-GFP primary antibody and Hoechst 33342. (B) Wildtype zebrafish larva at 1 and 2 dpi showing progressing RVFV infection around the site of injection. (C) Tg (fabp10a:DsRed; nacre) zebrafish larvae demonstrating infection in the liver using anti-RFP primary antibody. (D) Wildtype zebrafish larva showing infection of the retina, optic tectum (yellow circle), the anterior and posterior macula (red circle), the ganglia (yellow arrows), and neuromasts (red arrows) of the lateral line. dpi = days post infection. (E) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 and RVFVeGFP per zebrafish larva immersed in Danieau’s solution supplemented with ruxolitinib (25 µM) from 0 dpi. Inoculum: ~1 CCID50 of RVFV35/74 or ~15 CCID50 of RVFVeGFP. Mean ± s.e.m. of 8 pools of 10 larvae from 8 independent experiments. (F) Wildtype zebrafish larva at 6 dpi, showing extensive dissemination of RVFVeGFP infection after immersion in Danieau’s solution supplemented with ruxolitinib (25 µM) from 0 dpi. Image has not been 3D-deconvoluted. dpi = days post infection; RVFV = Rift Valley fever virus; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant.

The effect of stat1a and stat1b knockout on RVFV viral replication, dissemination, and innate immune response. (A) Schematic representation of the creation of stat1a−/− and stat1b−/− larvae. Created in BioRender. (B) The relative mRNA expression fold change in stat1a and stat1b in stat1a−/− zebrafish larvae. (C) The relative mRNA expression fold change in stat1a and stat1b in stat1b−/− zebrafish larvae. (D) Survival curves of stat1a+/+ (n = 69), stat1a+/− (n = 129), and stat1a−/− (n = 74) larvae of the F2 generation. (E) Survival curves of stat1b+/+ (n = 71), stat1b+/− (n = 92), and stat1b−/− (n = 55) larvae of the F2 generation. (F) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 per stat1a−/− zebrafish larva. Inoculum: ~1 CCID50 of RVFV35/74. Mean ± s.e.m. of 5–6 pools of 10 larvae from 6 independent experiments. (H) Viral RNA copies of RVFV35/74 per stat1b−/− zebrafish larva. Inoculum: ~1 CCID50 of RVFV35/74. Mean ± s.e.m. of 6 pools of 10 larvae from 6 independent experiments. (G,I) Whole mount immunohistochemistry fluorescence images of RVFVeGFP infected stat1a−/− (G) and stat1b−/− (I) zebrafish larvae at 10× magnification, using anti-GFP primary antibody (green) and Hoechst 33342 (blue). Inoculum: ~15 CCID50 of RVFVeGFP. Stat1a−/− zebrafish larva at 4 dpi, showing extensive dissemination of RVFVeGFP infection. Stat1b−/− zebrafish larva at 3 dpi, showing limited dissemination of RVFVeGFP infection. (J) Fold induction of gene expression relative to wildtype larvae of hematopoietic markers in stat1a−/− and stat1b−/− larvae, respectively, at 6 dpf. Results determined by RT-qPCR and normalized to 18s, ef1α, and β-actin mRNA. dpi = days post infection; RVFV = Rift Valley fever virus; WT = wildtype; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001; ns = not significant.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Viruses