IMAGE

Figure 2.

ID
ZDB-IMAGE-241115-84
Source
Figures for Ono et al., 2024
Image
Figure Caption

Figure 2. No effects of Gpr156 deletion on mechanosensitivity were detected in LES hair cells.

(A) Leftrmal reversed bundle polarity at the LPR. Arrows, Directions of hair bundle motion that produce a depolarizing receptor potential. Right, Maps of recordings from LES zone, lateral to the LPR in heterozygotes, and similar location in null mutants, but without bundle reversal (arrows). (B–E) Exemplar IMET recordings from voltage-clamped LES HCs of different type (I vs. II, columns) and genotype (het vs. null, rows), and ranging in age from P10 to P31. XY scales for all 4 are in D. Each panel shows IMET current (average of 3 traces) evoked by 3 of many iterated bundle displacements (bottom of D, E): negatively and positively saturating stimuli (Xmin, Xmax) plus a step to ~ X1/2 (midpoint) of the operating range. Red traces, fits of current decay for step to X1/2 with Equations 2 or 3 (Methods). Voltage was clamped with the indicated holding currents at –94 mV (type I) and –84 mV (type II). (F,G) G(X) relations from type I (F) and type II (G) HCs. G, was peak MET conductance taken at the onset of each of 20 or 40 displacement steps (X), iterated by 100 nm or 35 nm, respectively, and averaged across 3 repeated stimulus families. Mean ± SEM; n=5–8 cells. Fitted G(X) parameters are statistically similar for Gpr156del/+ and Gpr156del/del HCs (see Supplementary file 2). Filled circles, X1/2 values from fits. Xmax: 1.1–1.3 µm. Xmin; –0.2 to –0.45 µm.

Acknowledgments
This image is the copyrighted work of the attributed author or publisher, and ZFIN has permission only to display this image to its users. Additional permissions should be obtained from the applicable author or publisher of the image. Full text @ Elife